Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(7): e24537, 2021 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1091184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of coagulation dysfunction in Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is inconsistent. We aimed to explore the impact of coagulation dysfunction amongst patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases from December 1, 2019 to April 27, 2020 following Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data about coagulation (Platelets, PT, APTT, fibrin, fibrinogen degradation products, D-dimer), prevalence of coagulation dysfunction and mortality were extracted. Meta regression was used to explore the heterogeneity. RESULTS: Sixteen observational studies were included, comprising 2, 139 patients with confirmed COVID-19. More severe COVID-19 cases tended to have higher mean D-dimer (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03, P < .001). The similar pattern occurred with PT and fibrin, with a contrary trend for PLTs. Coagulation dysfunction was more frequent in severe cases compared to less severe (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.67, P < .001). Higher mortality was associated with COVID-19-related coagulopathy (RR 10.86, 2.86 to 41.24, P < .001). Prevalence of ARDS was increased in more severe patients than less severe cases (RR 16.52, 11.27 to 24.22, P < .001). PT, fibrin and D-dimer levels elevated significantly in non-survivors during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Presence of coagulation dysfunction might be associated with COVID-19 severity, and coagulopathy might be associated with mortality. Coagulation markers including PT, fibrin and D-dimer may imply the progression of COVID-19. This illuminates the necessity of effectively monitoring coagulation function for preventing COVID-19-related coagulopathy, especially in severe patients. For the obvious heterogeneity, the quality of the evidence is compromised. Future rigorous randomized controlled trials that assess the correlation between coagulation and COVID-19 are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020183514).


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , Blood Coagulation Factors , COVID-19/complications , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19/mortality , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(1): 42-55, 2021.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065468

ABSTRACT

During the new pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, there is short knowledge regarding the management of different disease areas, such as coagulopathy and interpretation of D-dimer levels, its association with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and controversy about the benefit of anticoagulation. Thus, a systematic review has been performed to define the role of D-dimer in the disease, the prevalence of DIC and the usefulness of anticoagulant treatment in these patients. A literature search was performed to analyze the studies of COVID-19 patients. Four recommendations were drawn based on expert opinion and scientific knowledge, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The present review suggests the presence of higher levels of D-dimer in those with worse prognosis, there may be an overdiagnosis of DIC in the course of the disease and there is no evidence on the benefit of starting anticoagulant treatment based only on isolated laboratory data.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , COVID-19/blood , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Critical Illness , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/diagnosis , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/drug therapy , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Overuse , Observational Studies as Topic , Pandemics , Prevalence , Prognosis , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(5): 622-632, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1049179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. DESIGN: In a multicenter cohort study of 3239 critically ill adults with COVID-19, the incidence of VTE and major bleeding within 14 days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was evaluated. A target trial emulation in which patients were categorized according to receipt or no receipt of therapeutic anticoagulation in the first 2 days of ICU admission was done to examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. A Cox model with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding was used. SETTING: 67 hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with COVID-19 admitted to a participating ICU. MEASUREMENTS: Time to death, censored at hospital discharge, or date of last follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 3239 patients included, the median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 53 to 71 years), and 2088 (64.5%) were men. A total of 204 patients (6.3%) developed VTE, and 90 patients (2.8%) developed a major bleeding event. Independent predictors of VTE were male sex and higher D-dimer level on ICU admission. Among the 2809 patients included in the target trial emulation, 384 (11.9%) received early therapeutic anticoagulation. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 days, patients who received early therapeutic anticoagulation had a similar risk for death as those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.35]). LIMITATION: Observational design. CONCLUSION: Among critically ill adults with COVID-19, early therapeutic anticoagulation did not affect survival in the target trial emulation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , COVID-19/complications , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19/mortality , Critical Illness , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/virology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/mortality , Venous Thromboembolism/virology
6.
J Intern Med ; 289(3): 411-419, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-950886

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability and thromboembolism are prominent features of severe COVID-19, and ongoing anticoagulant use might be protective. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide register-based cohort study in Sweden, February through May, 2020, to assess whether ongoing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use was associated with reduced risk of hospital admission for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, or a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death due to laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. RESULTS: DOAC use (n = 103 703) was not associated with reduced risk of hospital admission for COVID-19 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] [95% confidence interval] 1.00 [0.75-1.33] vs. nonuse atrial fibrillation comparator [n = 36 875]; and aHR 0.94 [0.80-1.10] vs. nonuse cardiovascular disease comparator [n = 355 699]), or ICU admission or death due to COVID-19 (aHRs 0.76 [0.51-1.12], and 0.90 [0.71-1.15], respectively). CONCLUSION: Ongoing DOAC use was not associated with reduced risk of severe COVID-19, indicating that prognosis would not be modified by early outpatient DOAC initiation.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , COVID-19/complications , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Flutter/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/epidemiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , Registries , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Sweden/epidemiology
7.
East Mediterr Health J ; 26(9): 999-1004, 2020 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-819546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could be complicated with coagulopathy and high risk of thromboembolic events. AIMS: The main aim of the present study was to find the coagulation profile of intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients with COVID-19 from Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran. METHODS: Coagulation parameters were analyzed using appropriate methods in 74 patients (24 patients aged <60 years and 50 patients ≥60 years) and were compared with 35 survivors (severe COVID-19) and 39 non-survivors (severe COVID-19) historically admitted to the ICU. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of patients had abnormal prothrombin time and international normalized ratio. The rates of mortality and comorbidity in patients aged ≥ 60 years were 73.7% and 78.4% compared to 26.3% and 21.6%, respectively, in patients aged < 60 years. CONCLUSION: We found an abnormal pattern of coagulation parameters and association of advanced age and comorbidities with a high rate of mortality in severe COVID-19 patients, which should be taken into consideration in their hospital management.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , International Normalized Ratio , Iran , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prothrombin Time , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(4): 825-832, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-696135

ABSTRACT

The new outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a serious global public health concern. A more in-depth study of blood coagulation abnormality is needed. We retrospectively analyzed 147 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to three ICUs in Wuhan from February 9th, 2020 to March 20th, 2020. The baseline coagulation and other characteristics were studied. Our results showed that the prolonged PT, FDP, DD were positively correlated with the levels of neutrophils, ferritin, LDH, total bilirubin, multi-inflammation cytokines, and negatively correlated with the lymphocytes level (p < 0.01). The level of ATIII was significantly negatively correlated with the levels of neutrophils, ferritin, LDH, total bilirubin, IL2R, IL6 and IL8 (p < 0.05). The patients in the ARDS group had a more prominent abnormality in PT, FDP, DD and ATIII, while the patients in the AKI group had more prolonged PT, more severe FDP and DD level, more inferior ATIII and Fib level than those in the non-AKI group (p < 0.01). The value of PT, DD and FDP were positively correlated with the classical APACHE II, SOFA and qSOFA scores, while the ATIII was negatively correlated with them (p < 0.001). The high levels of PT, FDP and DD were correlated with in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001). In conclusion, blood coagulation disorder was prominent in ICU patients with COVID-19 and was correlated with multi-inflammation factors. The abnormality of blood coagulation parameters could be an adverse prognostic indicator for ICU patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , Blood Coagulation , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Inflammation/virology , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Aged , Antithrombin III/metabolism , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Hospital Mortality , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Inflammation/diagnosis , Inflammation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
9.
Thromb Haemost ; 120(11): 1524-1535, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-653691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of coagulation dysfunction in Chinese COVID-19 patients and to determine the association of coagulopathy with the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. METHODS: A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different abnormal coagulation indicators in COVID-19 patients in China was performed. The difference of coagulation indicators and the incidence of DIC were compared between severe cases and nonsevere cases as well as nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 22 Chinese studies involving 4,889 confirmed COVID-19 inpatients were included. The average D-dimer value of COVID-19 patients is 0.67 µg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.78), and 29.3% (95% CI: 20.1-38.5%) of patients showed elevated D-dimer values. Severe patients had significantly higher D-dimer levels and prolonged prothrombin time (PT) compared with nonsevere patients. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher D-dimer levels, prolonged PT, and decreased platelet count compared with survivors. In total, 6.2% (95% CI: 2.6-9.9%) COVID-19 patients were complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), in which the log risk ratio in nonsurvivors was 3.267 (95% CI: 2.191-4.342, Z = 5.95, p < 0.05) compared with that in survivors. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of coagulopathy in Chinese COVID-19 inpatients is high, and both the abnormal coagulation indicators and DIC are closely associated with the severity and poor prognosis of these COVID-19 patients. Therefore, attention should be paid to coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Closely monitoring of coagulation indicators and application of appropriate anticoagulation may improve the prognosis of COVID-19 inpatients in China.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/epidemiology , Blood Coagulation , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
10.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(9): 2138-2144, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-641045

ABSTRACT

Hypercoagulability is an increasingly recognized complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such, anticoagulation has become part and parcel of comprehensive COVID-19 management. However, several uncertainties exist in this area, including the appropriate type and dose of heparin. In addition, special patient populations, including those with high body mass index and renal impairment, require special consideration. Although the current evidence is still insufficient, we provide a pragmatic approach to anticoagulation in COVID-19, but stress the need for further trials in this area.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , COVID-19 , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Selection , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
12.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 6159720, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-620018

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of coagulation indicators D-dimer (DD), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (Fg) in predicting the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were admitted to Tianyou Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020, and March 5, 2020, were included. The dynamic changes of DD, PT, APTT, and Fg were tested, and the correlation with CT imaging, clinical classifications, and prognosis was studied. RESULTS: Coagulation disorder occurred at the early stage of COVID-19 infection, with 50 (43.5%) patients having DD increased and 74 (64.3%) patients having Fg increased. The levels of DD and Fg were correlated with clinical classification. Among 23 patients who deceased, 18 had DD increased at the first lab test, 22 had DD increased at the second and third lab tests, and 18 had prolonged PT at the third test. The results from ROC analyses for mortality risk showed that the AUCs of DD were 0.742, 0.818, and 0.851 in three times of test, respectively; PT was 0.643, 0.824, and 0.937. In addition, with the progression of the disease, the change of CT imaging was closely related to the increase of the DD value (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coagulation dysfunction is more likely to occur in severe and critically ill patients. DD and PT could be used as the significant indicators in predicting the mortality of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Prothrombin Time , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Disease Progression , Female , Fibrinogen/metabolism , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombin Time , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
13.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(2): 281-286, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-232649

ABSTRACT

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suffered both high thrombotic and bleeding risk. The effect of SARS-CoV-2 on coagulation and fibrinolysis is not well known. We conducted a retrospective study of critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) a cause of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and we evaluated coagulation function using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) on day of admission (T0) and 5 (T5) and 10 (T10) days after admission to ICU. Coagulation standard parameters were also evaluated. Forty patients were enrolled into the study. The ICU and the hospital mortality were 10% and 12.5%, respectively. On ICU admission, prothrombin time was slightly reduced and it increased significantly at T10 (T0 = 65.1 ± 9.8 vs T10 = 85.7 ± 1.5, p = 0.002), while activated partial thromboplastin time and fibrinogen values were higher at T0 than T10 (32.2 ± 2.9 vs 27.2 ± 2.1, p = 0.017 and 895.1 ± 110 vs 332.5 ± 50, p = 0.002, respectively); moreover, whole blood thromboelastometry profiles were consistent with hypercoagulability characterized by an acceleration of the propagation phase of blood clot formation [i.e., CFT below the lower limit in INTEM 16/40 patients (40%) and EXTEM 20/40 patients (50%)] and significant higher clot strength [MCF above the upper limit in INTEM 20/40 patients (50%), in EXTEM 28/40 patients (70%) and in FIBTEM 29/40 patients (72.5%)]; however, this hypercoagulable state persists in the first five days, but it decreases ten day after, without returning to normal values. No sign of secondary hyperfibrinolysis or sepsis induced coagulopathy (SIC) were found during the study period. In six patients (15%) a deep vein thrombosis and in 2 patients (5%) a thromboembolic event, were found; 12 patients (30%) had a catheter-related thrombosis. ROTEM analysis confirms that patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia had a hypercoagulation state that persisted over time.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Thrombelastography , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Thrombophilia/diagnosis , Aged , Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Coagulation Disorders/mortality , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Illness , Female , Hospital Mortality , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Thromboembolism/blood , Thromboembolism/mortality , Thromboembolism/virology , Thrombophilia/blood , Thrombophilia/mortality , Thrombophilia/virology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL